-

In reading the texts assigned for this last Sunday before Christmas, I find myself returning again and again to a single line in the Isaiah passage—and I am struck by how painfully relevant it feels. Isaiah’s sharp question asks…
“Is it too little for you to weary mortals, that you weary my God also?”
The prophet exposes something—not only Ahaz’s personal fear and insecurity, but an even deeper illusion about power and a common construct of God. Ahaz imagines God to be like his own sovereign power: an authority to be appeased, a lawmaker who makes but does not follow law, a judge whose favor and rulings can be manipulated. Rather than listening to Isaiah, Ahaz relies on his own political calculation—on back-room alliances, threats, and retribution strategies. He refuses to look for God’s sign because his faith is in his own power.
I entered this Advent season contemplating the shadows and illusions of our day—the things that masquerade as truth and yet distort reality. And perhaps the deepest illusion in our public life today is this: that God’s highest concern is moral correctness and judgment.
This misrepresentation of God as merely a distant moral evaluator has leaked from the pulpits and into the cultural imagination. It undergirds media narratives, energizes political rhetoric, and weaponizes religious language for influence. For if God is imagined primarily as a moral judge, then any “good authority” is justified by promoting its moral purity claims. Scapegoating those who are “wrong” and claiming to be right (and righteous) becomes strategy. Even blatant falsehood and hatred are excused when framed as righteous necessity.
Isaiah’s rebuke reveals Ahaz’s folly…that fear-driven politics and theology wear humans out; and inevitably, it reduces faith to mere public performance and anxious control. And, according to Isaiah, this wearies God—not because God is exhausted, but because such illusions reduce God into something God is not.
The Advent theme for this final week is Love—as a growing culmination, a coming together with hope, peace, and joy into a fullness that reflects the Christ. As these realities are at work within us, something holy emerges. And this is where Advent invites us in the most embodied (incarnational) way.
These are not abstract spiritual concepts hovering somewhere above us. Hope, peace, joy, and love are real possibilities within the human body—etched into the nervous system, coiled in the emotional core, held within the chemistry of mind and heart. When they awaken, human wholeness becomes possible. Heaven—God’s presence—becomes our present reality.
This is the mystery of incarnation: matter and Spirit are not divided, but fully intertwined. We encounter God not by appeasing a distant judge but by awakening to Love already moving within and among us. And as we are more and more aware…Love animates us.
“God is love,” 1 John says. Love is not merely God’s action; it is God’s essence and reality. I reckon that is why John goes on to insist: if you do not love, you do not know God.
Not: if you obey.
Not: if you believe the right creed.
Not: if you vote correctly or defend your morality vigorously enough.If you do not love, you do not know God! Which means our dominant cultural—and churchy—illusion that moral rightness is the ultimate measure is exposed as idolatry. It substitutes control for communion, fear for trust, judgment for holiness.
And in our day—as political theater wears golden crosses and speaks with pious religious words to shame or defeat—it does not reveal divine authority, but rather like Ahaz, human insecurity. When public figures claim righteousness while sowing lies and outrage, they are not defending God but denying Love.
Isaiah’s warning, this week’s Advent theme, and John’s “God is love” all meet here—as an invitation to see our wearying of God, our misrepresentation of what is true power. And we are invited back to the power of embodied Love.
And so this week, as the Advent candles burn in the darkness, the invitation is not toward moral appeasement but toward awakening: to notice where fear constricts the heart, to discern where our illusions about God have distorted our desires, to allow Love to reorder our way.
Perhaps the sign Isaiah offered—ignored by Ahaz and fulfilled in Christ—is this: God will always choose presence over coercion. God’s power is never expressed through domination but communion. Love is the reality through which God makes Godself known.
For sure, the shadows of this season are real. And Advent calls us to see through that darkness, to discern Love stirring within our very physiology, and to trust that heaven’s fullness begins not in measured moral performance but in awakened, attuned presence and loving action.
-

“If cows can have that much joy, something about our lives needs to change.”
Those were Ashley’s words nearly ten years ago as we drove away from a small creamery in Jay, New York. We had stopped there during our sabbatical, and by chance, the young couple who made cheese invited us to walk with them as they brought the dairy cows in for afternoon milking. So there we were—our family of five in a slow procession up a gravel path toward the barn.
What surprised us wasn’t the milking process. It was the joy—both in the farmers and in the cows themselves. They moved together with a peaceful sense of purpose. Not frantic or giddy. Just steady. Alive. Directed. They knew where they were going. They knew work was ahead, but also that there was rest, food, and a rhythm they trusted. Their joy wasn’t rooted in a life of ease; it flowed from a life of direction.
Ashley’s comment as we drove away wasn’t about buying cows or moving to a farm (though we didn’t rule it out). She was naming something deeper. At that point in our lives, we were doing more daily reacting than moving with intention. We were busy, faithful, exhausted—but not directed. We were doing many good, churchy, ministry-shaped things without a clear sense of what was leading us. We had lost our telos.
Telos is a Greek word that means end, goal, or purpose. It’s not just a destination—it’s a vision that gives shape to everything before it. It’s what pulls you forward when the present feels heavy. It’s what makes the journey meaningful because you trust where it leads.
A couple of years later—seven years ago this week—after we had intentionally reshaped our rhythms and priorities, our spiritual guide Walter came to visit our new home, an old house we were slowly restoring. As he was leaving, he said, “Shane, you can measure the fruit of your decisions by the joy in your children.”
That wasn’t parenting advice. It was spiritual insight. Joy shows up when life is aligned—when daily practices move in the same direction as your deepest hopes. Joy isn’t a reward for getting everything right, nor is it manufactured happiness. True joy is evidence that you’re headed somewhere that’s in line with your clearest desire and deepest hope.
That’s the kind of joy that this week of Advent invites us into.
Today, as we begin the third week of Advent and light the candle of joy, many of us may feel a disconnect. Joy probably isn’t the word we’d use to describe our lives right now. We arrive tired. Carrying fear. Living with uncertainty. So when Scripture speaks of singing and everlasting joy, it can sound distant—even unrealistic.
But Advent joy isn’t naïve optimism. It’s joy born in exile. Advent joy belongs to people who know loss and displacement and still they dare to believe the story isn’t over.
The text that has held my attention this week comes from Isaiah 35: “The ransomed of the LORD shall return and come to Zion with singing; everlasting joy shall be upon their heads… and sorrow and sighing shall flee away.”
Isaiah spoke these words to people living in exile—disadvantaged, displaced, worn down by a system that told them, “This is as good as it gets.” The propaganda claimed life was A+++; but reality of the day was bare survival. Isaiah doesn’t deny their pain. But he does something essential: he gives them a picture.
“There is a road,” he tells them. “There is a destination. You are not wandering aimlessly. You are on your way somewhere.” And that vision didn’t seek to erase their suffering—it reframed it. Exile became the middle of the story, not the end. Suffering became part of the movement instead of meaninglessness. And joy became possible—not because life was easy, but because the path was headed somewhere different.
Notice what Isaiah doesn’t say. He doesn’t tell them to pray for escape, assign blame, or wait passively for rescue. Instead, he gives them something to do while they walk the road: “Strengthen the weak hands, and make firm the feeble knees. Say to those who are fearful, ‘Be strong, do not fear.’”
This is what joy looks like on the ground. Joy steadies what is trembling. Joy speaks courage into fear. Joy walks with others when the road is long and uneven. It doesn’t deny reality—it resists despair. It refuses the lie that nothing can change. Joy activates resilience and keeps people moving forward together.
Here’s the challenge we face: we live in a society that keeps us busy but rarely helps us ask what all that busyness is for. We manage calendars, responsibilities, and obligations—but we never quite name our destination. And when there’s no clear telos, joy becomes fragile. Disappointment feels final. Waiting feels wasted. Exhaustion shrinks our imagination to survival mode, and cynicism whispers that hope is naïve.
I suspect part of the problem is that many of us were taught—sometimes explicitly, sometimes quietly—that the point of our faith is escape. That we’re just enduring this world until we can leave it behind. But the biblical hope isn’t that we go to heaven someday. It’s that heaven comes here. That all things are being made new. And that our daily lives are meant to be a preview of that slow unveiling future.
If our telos is escape, joy isn’t genuine. But if we trust that time is unfolding something beautiful—and when we join that work—joy becomes our guide.
This is why I’ve come to see Advent not as a countdown to Christmas, but as a pathway. Hope, peace, joy, love—they aren’t random virtues. They form a road. Each week turns us toward the Christ candle, toward a vision of what it means to be fully human and fully alive.
So the invitation today is simple, while also demanding: recover your sense of direction!
Ask yourself: What am I moving toward? What vision of wholeness, justice, and God’s kingdom come is shaping my choices right now? And then ask: Who around me needs help taking their next step? Whose hands need strengthening? Whose knees need steadying? Whose hope needs encouragement?
The cows knew where they were going, and their joy flowed from that knowing. Our children’s joy reflected a life brought back into alignment. And the exiles in Isaiah dared to sing because someone gave them a picture of what was coming.
Joy is not the absence of suffering. Joy is not escape—it is reorientation. It is the assurance that we are on a path that leads somewhere, and that we are not walking it alone. For even now, as we walk together, we can begin to sing.
-

A few days ago, while hanging Christmas lights on our front porch, a thought struck me: the entire Christmas story requires darkness to mean anything at all. Without the darkness of night, there is no story of light breaking through. Without shadows, there is nothing to illuminate.
Under the cover of darkness Joseph and Mary fled King Herod’s plan to kill the newborn child. The shepherds watched over their flocks at night. In the darkness of the night, the guiding star was revealed.
It was into such darkness that the ancient message was first spoken: “Fear not.” Not because the world had suddenly become safe. Not because threats had disappeared or powerful people had discovered the power of compassion. But because something was taking place that did not depend on the world’s power systems at all.
While King Herod tightened his grip—hoarding control, crushing the vulnerable, governing from his own anxious insecurity—a different kind of Humanity arrived. An infant. Naked. Dependent. Wrapped in the humility of a borrowed stable, born to parents on the run from political power.
The contrast could not be sharper. Or more applicable to teach us how to see our own day.
The ancient texts we read this week insist that real peace—the kind that heals, the kind that lasts—does not emerge through domination or control. It comes when “the poor are defended,” “the needy delivered,” and when “the oppressor”—whoever and wherever they may be—is stopped from doing harm (Psalm 72:4).
In this essay on the matter, Walter Brueggemann calls Psalm 72 a kind of “charter for good government,” a public vision in which power exists for one purpose: to safeguard and lift up those with no leverage. The psalmist imagines a ruler whose authority is not measured by military strength or political victory, but by mercy extended to the most vulnerable. Peace, in this psalm, is not calm enforced by fear or oversight—it is the fruit of compassion flowing downward.
Last week I mentioned that this year I am writing about the shadows of Advent—the internal postures and social conditions that erode our capacity to live in harmony. Peace is often the first casualty of those shadows. For, when fear becomes our governing inner spirit, we grasp for whatever version of order we can manufacture through control. Some think this is “peace,” but it isn’t. It’s forced silence purchased by intimidation and lopsided negotiation, a counterfeit calm that evaporates the moment power shifts.
The message of the angels—if we are to take them seriously—offers something entirely different. Their message breaks into the night not with “be very afraid,” not with “arm yourselves,” but with “fear not.” Something is coming, they insist, that will look nothing like the “peace” we’ve been settling for.
This becomes especially challenging for those who have grown used to confusing political power with moral authority, or national security with the common good. Christmas exposes the folly of that confusion. It reveals the contrast between the Christ-child—arriving with nothing but vulnerability—and every Herod-like leader who clings to dominance by leveraging fear.
And here’s the thing: Herod is not locked in the past. Herod is any leader, system, or movement that sees the poor, the immigrant, the minority, or the outsider as a threat to be neutralized rather than a neighbor to be protected.
Tragically, many who claim to follow the way of Jesus have baptized Herod and its political ways. Sometimes out of anger, sometimes out of confusion, most often out of fear. Fear makes cruelty look like courage. Fear convinces us that safety can be gained through someone else’s suffering.
But the imagination of the ancient texts points to another way. It insists that peace begins at the bottom: with the widow, the orphan, the immigrant, the laborer, the one who has no helper. Brueggemann describes Psalm 72’s king as one who uses power “on behalf of the weak, the strayed, the lost”—a sharp contrast to rulers who use power to preserve themselves and promote their own name.
If the peace we seek does not start with those who have the fewest protections, it is not real peace. It is simply Herod again, disguised with makeup and a comb-over.
The lectionary psalm this week makes this unmistakable. It does not pray for a king who can defend himself and his powerful friends. It prays for the defenseless. It does not ask for a ruler who can “win.” It longs for a ruler who serves on behalf of the oppressed. It does not say, “may he crush our enemies.” It says, “crush the oppressor.”
Whoever they may be. Wherever they may be. Even if the oppressor is someone we may have supported or voted for.
Advent requires this personal reflection and responsibility. Because in our present moment—in this country, in this political climate—fear has become something like a social sacrament. Entire movements feed on the fear of the stranger, the immigrant, racial difference, vulnerable neighbors whose mere presence challenges our sense of control.
Fear shapes policies, sermons, voting blocs, fundraising campaigns. It energizes crowds. It sanctifies vengeance, murder, and needless suffering. It confuses domination with righteousness.
And many, including many Christians, cheer it on. Or worse—shrug.
They cheer when immigrants are described as infestations and garbage. They cheer when whole communities of color are punished collectively. They cheer when vengeance is treated as virtue. They cheer when the poor are cast as obstacles instead of image-bearers.
But Advent confronts us with this truth: you cannot arrive at peace by energizing fear. You cannot defend a kingdom of mercy by adopting the posture of domination. You cannot live out justice by striking down the very people scripture commands us to lift up. Psalm 72 will not allow it. And the Child in the manger weeps.
This second week of Advent invites us to consider whether we have allowed fear to deform our moral imagination. Whether we have traded true peace for worldly power. Whether we have become, in ways subtle or overt, the very oppressors the psalm warns against.
Because the Christ-child does not arrive to secure our power. He arrives to dismantle the myth that power can save us. He stands with those the world discards—calling us to do the same.
As Brueggemann reminds us, Psalm 72 is not escapist poetry. It is a public imagination for a different kind of governance, a different kind of social order—one where the vulnerable are centered and power is measured by its mercy. Advent echoes that imagination. It exposes every idol we’ve bowed to, especially the idol of power, and invites us again to choose the way of the manger over the way of the throne.
So this week, as we light the candle of peace, we are not lighting it for quiet neighborhoods or cozy holiday celebrations. We are lighting it for the peace that begins where it must always begin: with the poor defended, the needy cared for, and every oppressor stripped of their ability to harm.
To “fear not,” as the message declares—not because the world is calm, but because the peace we await is made by acts of mercy. A peace in which, as the old hymn sings, “in His name all oppression shall cease.” Peace that comes from choosing to stand with the vulnerable, to defend those without leverage, to resist the seduction of power that promises security at someone else’s expense.
The lights on my porch are few. They do not illuminate very far. But they do mark a refusal…a refusal to let the darkness have the final word, a refusal to let fear govern, a refusal to mistake control for peace.
For peace will not come from fear. It never has. It never will.
-

I turned forty-eight a few weeks ago, and in a birthday moment gifted to me by my wise-cracking daughter, I realized—you’re right, I am likely more than half-dead. Oddly, that awareness has been a gift.
For most of my life, I’ve chased the next day, imagining some future “when-I-grow-up” moment when life would finally settle into its intended meaning. But somewhere along the way, the future became the present, and I now find myself with more life experience than life expectancy.
And it’s freeing. To acknowledge that my time is limited is not only to face the future but to recognize the responsibility that comes with the life one has already lived and been given. My life-guiding questions have now become: What will I do with the experiences that have shaped me? What will I make with the stories I’ve inherited?
One of those inherited stories is the faith tradition that raised me. I grew up in a conservative stream of American Christianity, a sect referred to as the holiness movement. It was a tradition that emphasized personal conversion, moral purity, and a “holiness of heart and life.” Planted early in my young imagination was the thought of sinners in need of salvation, the urgency of public revival, and the eternal consequences of one’s life under the judgment of God.
As I was growing up, the Church and its message were assumed essential and central. Within that world, I sensed a calling. By my twenties, that call led me into pastoral ministry. I preached, pastored, and genuinely believed the local church was the hope of the world.
In my thirties, I began to notice the cracks—not in the foundation of faith itself, but in what had been built upon it. I saw how the church could cultivate fear and call it faith, promote moral disgust disguised as holiness, and demand forgiveness to protect abuse while silencing the harmed.
Looking back now, I realize my inherited tradition ought to wear a warning label. What once promised life too often produced control. What was meant to form character sometimes only managed to preserve conformity. And with the clarity that comes from being half-dead, I can now name what I couldn’t before: much of what I inherited has become less like a living vine and more like an artificial trellis—built to keep its shape rather than to bear new fruit. What once required us to surrender all has been rewritten as a way to keep what we have.
What I’ve experienced isn’t an isolated failing or a few bad branches—it’s symptomatic of something deeper in the soil. To say it plainly: the fruit of the church-at-large is often unrecognizable when compared to the pattern, life, and teachings of Jesus.
The conservative church, in particular, has become so deeply entangled with nationalism that the pulpits of my youth now sound more like empire propaganda than gospel announcement. The theological imagination once formed by the Sermon on the Mount now bends toward winning, defending, excluding, and preserving. The cross—once a symbol that exposed the ways of power and privilege—now flanks the flags of power on the very platforms that bless them. What was once rooted in Sabbath rest and shared bread now performs as a marketplace of branded experiences. And those who once called me to faithfulness seem unable to discern the captivity of their own faith and the wandering of their own allegiance.
The result across much of the church is a spirituality of scarcity and exhaustion: anxious, defensive, and transactional. The very institutions that once gave my life structure—I can no longer trust with honest integrity. Of course, this is not everywhere and everyone, but it’s widespread enough that the faithful exceptions have become exactly that—exceptions.
And yet, I cannot simply walk away. For this is part of my story, written into my very being. I hold some measure of responsibility for it—and within it. These are my people, even if I can barely recognize them. This is my tradition, even when it has lost its way. While I no longer stand comfortably inside the institutions of Christianity, I have not abandoned them either. I find myself living somewhere in between—at the edge, in the margin.
And living in the margin, I’ve discovered, is not a place of exile. It is sacred soil—where decay and renewal mingle, where the dirt reveals inherent dignity, where humus gives rise to humility, where something new can patiently grow.
From the margin, I can still see both the beauty that remains and the illusions that persist. Perhaps it’s a bit like loving a friend caught up in a pyramid scheme—you care deeply but can no longer trust the relationship is fully genuine. You long for real connection with the person beneath the façade. You hope they’ll wake up before they’ve lost everything, including themselves.
And I confess, to stand in the margin at first felt like failure. “I no longer fit in,” I told myself. “What and who am I now?” But then I began to see a different story taking shape.
Richard Rohr calls it “the edge of the inside”—the place of deepest faith and freest grounding. It’s the vantage point that holds both gratitude for the institution and freedom from its illusions. What appears peripheral and “edgy” may, in fact, be the very place where real transformation takes root—where we can see with clearer eyes precisely because we’re no longer blinded by the spotlights or paid by the offering plates.
Walter Brueggemann imagines it as prophetic space: the margin is where the poet-prophets dwell, challenging the royal consciousness and envisioning another way. For when the center becomes an axis of power and performance, the margin becomes the necessary soil for new imagination—or perhaps for the recovery of old imagination, the kind that animated those first communities who gathered in homes and catacombs, who shared all things in common, who were known by their poverty of spirit and solidarity with the poor.
So…I’ve come to this place with peace: to live in the margin is not to give up on the church or the faith; it is a place for honest and holy living.
So what now? I no longer seek a new blueprint for church, a model to scale, or a program to develop. Those impulses feel more like residue from the system I left—the need to prove faithfulness through measurable results.
I’m learning instead to settle into the margin—to trust that the scaffolding doesn’t have to look like it once did. That companions matter more than rigid institutions. That practices matter more than programs. That presence matters more than performance.
In my work as a spiritual director, I see glimmers of it already: small, intentional moments…not for performance but of deep presence and dialogue. People who show up with one another even when it feels unproductive—who sit with lament without rushing to resolve it, who break bread with joy, and who speak honestly about where love has met them, and where it hasn’t.
So, with my remaining half-life—those years my daughter reminded me that I hopefully have left—I’m learning to ask: What are my tasks while living in the margin?
The answer is simpler, and much harder, than I expected. It’s something like this:
I’m offering presence and building companionship—developing a willingness to stay in the tension, to hold both grief and hope, to honor what was while remaining open to what might be. The reality is this: I need a host of reliable companions who can offer a sense of coherence in our fragmented age. And I also hope I can be such a companion for others.
I’m asking reflective questions that don’t demand immediate answers. I’m listening for how and where the Spirit may guide. I’m making space for silence that doesn’t need to be filled. I’m holding space where people can arrive honestly, without pretense or performance.
I’m speaking with courage about the story of God that is larger than any one container, more generous than any gatekeeper, and more given to humility than hierarchy.
And I pray—not with words of wanting or wishing, but with a stillness and silence that says everything I know how to say.
And tomorrow? I’ll continue to tend the soil in the margin, to connect with companions walking a similar path. I’ll show up to tend what’s mutually offered—to practice presence, hospitality, and honest conversation.
That seems like faithful work for whatever time I have left!
-

A few years ago, while in the thick of my own discernment, I asked Walter Brueggemann, “What does it even mean to be a pastor today?”
He immediately laughed—that full-bellied laugh—leaned back and said, “Who knows!?” Then he shifted forward, his face sharpening with sudden seriousness: “It seems the only thing we have left is to live as a non-anxious presence.”
The only thing we have left.
Even then, Walter seemed to know that non-anxious presence was not a mechanism for living a good and beautiful life, but rather a last faithful response within a failed world under judgment. It was the practice that remained when so much else had collapsed.
Much has changed since that conversation, including the notable loss of Walter and his faithful interpreting of the world unfolding around us. And while the framework of non-anxious presence served me well in my lament and relinquishing of what was, I’ve come to believe that non-anxiousness is meant to be a beginning rather than an arrival.
In our present context—where so many in public leadership and authority no longer take seriously the responsibility of lived example, where leadership has become performative spectacle rather than humble service—there must be a different way.
And I reckon that our particular moment is so crucial that this is not a time for non-anxious remaining. Now is the time for stepping out with intentionally active presence—a moment for choosing the agency of love over the reactivity of fear.
For the truth is, our world has become skilled at shouting “No!”—no to opponents, no to complexity, no to diversity of ideas and culture, no to personal and social responsibility—while forgetting that the power of a true No depends on the integrity of a deeper Yes.
The deep need of our day is not to float non-anxiously above the fray, but to boldly embody both the courage to say, “Not like that,” and the wisdom to say, “Like this.”
Someone might say this is still non-anxious work, and in a sense that’s true. It is to be not anxious. But there is a profound difference between a posture of negation and one of affirmation—between the via negativa and the via positiva.
The Christian contemplative tradition has long understood this distinction. The apophatic way seeks to know God by saying what God is not—a theology of resistance to clear naming for the sake of leaving open the unknowable. It has its place; for sometimes we must first clear away false images and assumptions.
But the kataphatic way uses positive language to describe what the divine actually is—not merely what it isn’t.
Both are essential movements for clarity. The via negativa gives us the courage to name what is false, distorted, or harmful—“No, not that.” The via positiva gives us the imagination to name what is true, good, and beautiful—“Yes, like this.” Together they form a mature way of being, one capable of discernment rather than reaction.
The way of fear and anxiousness, on the other hand, blurs these distinctions. Fear cannot hold a clear No or a generous Yes. It must find an enemy to blame, a scapegoat to condemn, because it cannot bear the mirror of its own condition and responsibility
And to remain in resistance to fear is one thing; to be animated by loving action is another. If we stay only in a stance of resistance, I suspect there’s a hidden confession—that fear still owns the center of us, still sets the terms. But when our life is grounded in a different reality, a deep trust in the ongoing work of an active Spirit, we can live in that activated way of being.
The goal is not to live in a state of repeatedly telling ourselves, don’t be anxious, don’t be anxious, don’t be anxious. Psychological research affirms what the spiritual tradition has long known: the way of peace is not the absence of anxiety, but its own distinct movement into the presence of something more grounded.
Similarly, I’ve learned from Barbara Fredrickson’s research that demonstrates positive emotions like love, joy, and gratitude are not mere reversals of fear—they are their own distinct pathways that broaden our awareness, build resilience, and deepen connection.
This is what the contemplative knows: to say “No” with integrity clears the ground; to say “Yes” to the way of love cultivates life.
The via negativa plows the ground.
The via positiva plants the garden.
The Way That Remains
Maybe this is what Walter was pointing us toward all along. To live as a non-anxious presence was never meant to be a retreat from the world’s tension, but a resource for its repair. It was the last work in a failed world under judgment—and because it was all the good that remained, it became the threshold to something new.
The Way of Jesus has always been quiet, compassionate, non-violent, unthreatened presence. Not passive withdrawal but intentional action. Leadership by embodied example rather than performative display. Influence through love rather than manipulation through fear.
It is a Way of life that trusts that God’s work has never been stalled by human panic—that Love is always present, steadily remaking the world beneath the mess.
So perhaps the invitation is simply this: to recover the clarity of No and Yes—to say No to fear’s smallness, its petty blaming and scapegoating, and Yes to love’s largeness, its patient and creative participation in the redemption of all things.
To begin practicing active presence not as protest, but as deep participation. To embody generous love not as resistance, but as bold revelation.
What might this look like? Surely it begins as small as a mustard seed:
Sitting with a friend for nothing but intentional encouragement.
Giving a blessing with no expectation of return.
An unhurried walk, letting nature determine your pace.
A candle lit in the night, remembering peace is still possible.
One day a week of non-productivity, letting rest interrupt the need to prove or consume.
Listening to another’s story until they finish it themselves.
Standing at the bedside of someone in pain.
Standing between the threatener and the threatened.These are not non-anxious escapes. They are small acts of love in action—seeds sown into the unhurried Kingdom, already at work, already near, and open for your participation.
The Way awaits, and it is not anxious.
-

Just a couple of days ago, we dropped off our second child as she began her first year of college. While we knew this change was coming, it still feels rather sudden and disruptive to our family’s normal.
It is surely yet another season of change: the place settings at our family meal table are fewer, our daily rhythms are shifting, and even the leaves seem to already be signaling transition. As these shifts unfold, some questions have also begun to stir in me: What now? Where should my energy go? How can my work further expand for those who give so much of themselves to others?
This post is both a window into my current discernment, and an invitation to join me in shaping what might come next.
The Background
My doctoral dissertation was titled Imagining Other Care. Its primary focus was on the benefits of integrating an ancient mode of relational accompaniment called “spiritual direction” into healthcare and treatment environments. The research affirms spiritual direction as a transformative practice and demonstrates how it can reduce distress and trauma symptoms, elevate purpose and well-being, foster empathic relationships and inner development, and nurture resilience that sustains both individuals and the cultures in which they serve.
A little over two years ago, I organized my work into a business called Restwork – a place where my experience, research, and passion merge into one body of care. At its heart, Restwork exists to create formational environments, promote contemplative awareness, and cultivate the virtues of inherent dignity, compassion, gratitude, and self-direction.
I do this through four primary streams of service:
- Retreats and workshops that invite deep rest and learning.
- Contemplative leadership development for individuals and teams.
- Speaking engagements that inspire and equip communities.
- One-on-one spiritual direction – a practice of deep listening with those navigating questions, challenges, or seasons of change.
Restwork specializes in caring for those who care for others: healthcare workers, mental health practitioners, caregivers, pastors/clergy, and people-leaders. We help them ground their work and life in intentionality…to remember who they are, to receive the grace of a caring other, and to live and work from a place of overflow rather than scarcity, scatteredness, distraction, or exhaustion.
What I’ve Learned in This Work
Over the past two years, I’ve led multiple retreats and hosted CEOs, administrators, physicians, nurses, pastors, therapists, veterinarians, and other kinds of professional caregivers. I’ve also sat in spiritual direction with dozens of individuals navigating some of their hardest, darkest, and most confusing moments.
And what I’ve discovered feels more vital than ever: there is a deep hunger for safe, meaningful conversations that aren’t about diagnosing, fixing, or performing, but about truly being seen and heard.
Caregivers don’t need another corporate wellness solution or performance award; they need caring others—someone who can hold space for them, listen to the story of their lives, and witness as they discern their next step.
Everything we do through Restwork – retreats, one-on-one sessions, speaking, and training – is informed by the modality of spiritual direction. If that term is new to you, think of it like this: spiritual direction is a professional, confidential, compassion-filled conversation that helps you attend to what matters most—your inner being, your values, your sense of meaning—so you can live and lead from a place of groundedness and genuine agency.
It’s not mental-health therapy. It’s not coaching or even mentoring. It’s something slower paced, deeper, and (I believe) even more essential in a world fueled by frenzy, distraction, and shallow connections.
My Season of Change—and How You Can Participate
Over the past couple of years, I’ve been fortunate to be intentional with my energy and my own life practices. Now, I find myself with more space, energy, and time to give to others…and I’m looking to expand my work.
This season of change has reminded me that while roles and rhythms shift, the need for faithful presence does not. Just last week, I listened to a nurse who had carried the weight of too many dying patients, a pastor worn down by political tension in their congregation, a CEO processing how to better support their workforce, and a hospital HR administrator wrestling with a decision that felt like it could make or break her team.
Each of them needed just one thing: a steady, caring presence who would listen without judgment, let them breathe, reflect, and discover their next faithful action. And they did.
And this is where you can participate.
- Do you know someone who’s carrying a heavy load—a leader, healthcare worker, caregiver, or pastor? I would love to offer them space—a steady, listening presence in our noisy world. And if you’re able, consider sponsoring their participation.
- Does your healthcare organization need a voice on moral resilience, contemplative leadership, or the inner life of caregiving? I bring clinical experience, ongoing research, and hope into spaces that need all three.
- Does your church, group, workshop, or conference need a speaker? I’m open for 3–4 more speaking invitations this coming year.
- Do you teach or work in higher education? If you need an adjunct in spiritual formation, leadership, or a related subject, teaching is one of my deep joys.
Why This Matters
I believe that providing care for those who care for others is one of the most urgent needs of our time. So, if something here resonates, or if you simply want to know more, send me a note or forward this along to someone who comes to mind.
Every connection and every invitation has the potential to encourage and empower a life…and, in turn, the communities and organizations they serve.
Let’s make space for the caregivers in our world to be seen, heard, and supported.
-

Yesterday our oldest headed off to his junior year of college, and next week we will be dropping off our second for her freshman year. And today, as I try to hold back the dad tears, I am pondering the world they are entering—and will be living in. This post is written for them… yet, perhaps, it can apply to all of us.
Wendell Berry once sent me a letter. I still have it, tucked into one of my favorite books of his. If you ever go looking, you’ll find it marking the page of my favorite Berry poem, The Morning News. And there, in that poem, is a stanza that has guided me for many years:
I will purge my mind of the airy claims of church and state.
I will serve the earth
and not pretend my life could better serve.I received his letter just over ten years ago, when our family of five first made the decision to change the trajectory of our lives. I know you remember our move across the country, and the many shifts in our thinking and daily practices since. But what you may not fully understand is why we did it. We were not chasing opportunity or avoiding hardship. We were intentionally stepping away from the influence of power—the kind that erodes the soul, turning people into statistics, communities into voting maps, neighbors into customers, and friendships into disposable transactions.
We began our move in 2015 with a sense of how the world was about to change—and has it ever. Our move was an attempt to give you space to grow in different soil, and the opportunity to see the world with eyes unclouded by the propaganda of headlines, the pulpit, or the pews—where well-meaning words sometimes landed like stones, leaving marks we didn’t want you to forever carry.
In many ways, our choice worked. You’ve had room to breathe, to expand your vision, to notice the powers at work. But in other ways, there is no escaping it. Those who live through power are present everywhere.
The kind of power I am referring to has a pattern. History has taught us—if we are paying attention—that both church and state, once they taste it, develop an appetite for more and more control. They rarely admit this outright. They seek loyalty over truth, allegiance over conscience. In ancient Egypt, Pharaoh demanded both labor and worship. In Babylon, Nebuchadnezzar built a golden statue and decreed that all must bow—or burn. In first-century Jerusalem, Rome allowed the temple to stand, but only under Caesar’s program and control. Herod executed John the Baptist to save face at a banquet. In every case, power fears what it can not own—and so it seeks to destroy it.
This pattern is not just ancient history. It shows up in every community: in the smirk of the social insiders, in the “because I said so” of those who cannot lead without threat or control. And you can see it in more public forms today when Christian language and imagery are wielded as political props, when pulpits become campaign platforms, when religious people cozy up to authoritarian politicians because proximity to power feels like a victory over those they are disgusted by. Politicians, in turn, are thrilled to have voters who will cover the evil of their actions with their religious justifications. And power always has a scapegoat—someone whose simple existence is labeled “the real problem.”
Children, what I fear most for you is not the hardships of life. Hardship is inevitable, and you are more than capable of enduring and overcoming. And I know you can clearly see the more public issues of your day. What I fear is the slow erosion of your conscience for the sake of “peace,” “unity,” “cool,” “patriotism,” or “orthodoxy.” That you might be sold the lie that your worth or belonging is measured by your usefulness to someone else’s plan for your life.
Authoritarianism creeps. And it creeps from the halls of power into the hearts of people. It rarely first arrives in jackboots (although they have arrived!). More often, it comes wrapped in proclaimed virtue. It hides in sly humor and behind memes. It cloaks itself in righteous language or a flag. It tells you it is protecting you while quietly deciding what books you can read, what to believe, what questions you can ask, and whom you should distrust. It thrives on fear, knowing that fearful people will often cling to the very hand that is holding them down. And it always promises: Give us just a little more loyalty, a little more silence, a little more time, a little more obedience… and then you will be safe. That promise is never kept.
Berry’s words about purging “the airy claims of church and state” are not a rejection of community or good order. They are a rejection of idolatry and abuse. They remind us that our ultimate loyalty is not to a flag, a party, an opinion, a family name, a denomination, or a leader—but to the flourishing of life itself: to Love, expressed in justice, mercy, and humility. For Love, after all, is the other side of power—the kind of power that does not dominate but serves; not a power that grasps, but a power that gives.
The easy path ahead for you is to become certain in your judgments, to pick a side, and let it tell you what to believe, and fight its battles. That path will reward you at first—it will promise belonging and purpose—but it will also make you smaller, angrier, resentful, and less free.
The harder path is to stay awake: awake to beauty when ugliness dominates the headlines; awake to suffering when turning away is easier; awake to truth even when it costs you friends or challenges those you admire most.
So, as you step into this big, beautiful world… remember: there will always be voices eager to tell you what to believe, how to speak, whom to love, and what to fear. They will offer you certainty in exchange for your complexity. Belonging in exchange for your autonomy. Security in exchange for your soul.
Resist them.
Keep your hands in the soil beneath your feet and your ears tuned to voices without microphones. Choose neighbors over social clubs. Be wary of anyone who wishes to be big. Stay small in ego, big only in compassion. Test every power by this one question: Does it bear the fruit of love, mercy, justice, and humility? If not, it is not worth your allegiance.
And do not grow cynical, but do grow discerning. You will need it to live freely and faithfully.
When the voices of church or state grow loud, promising the world if you will bow, remember Berry’s words. Remember that life is not served best by allegiance to power, but by allegiance to the earth, to one another, and to the God (Love!) who is neither mascot of any nation nor chaplain of any empire.
And most of all, remember to serve—not as the powerful define service, but as the earth does: with patience, with care, with resiliency, and with an eye toward the generations who will inherit what you leave behind. It’s service to the earth that will keep you grounded.
May you always know that your worth is not in what you produce or who you please, but in the unshakable reality that you are loved… simply because you are.
-

Bad theology ruins a life. And eventually, it will ruin the world.
We are witnessing the consequences of bad theology unfold in real time. And not quietly. Not in an aging church with a crooked sign and seven members. No—this bad theology has gone mainstream. It’s loud. It presents as angry. It’s punitive. It thrives on accusations, lawsuits, and spectacles of shaming and scapegoating. It claims to save the world (or a way of life, or the church) while destroying actual lives. It operates under the banner of God but denies the very essence of God—that God is love.
It offers conjured certainties instead of compassion. It trades neighborliness for a kind of nationalism that has no neighbor—only loyalty to itself. And it’s everywhere.
(I say this with care: My writing here is primarily directed to a Christian audience—to those who follow the life pattern of Jesus. I recognize that not all faith traditions, nor all Christians, nor all persons, carry the same theological assumptions or histories. So my words won’t apply equally to all. But where they do, I hope they serve as both mirror and invitation.)
Likewise, good theology doesn’t automatically produce a well-ordered life or a better world. Theology isn’t math. It doesn’t yield predictable outputs. You can speak beautifully about God and still live a bitter, burned-out, or self-absorbed life. Just visit any church and there’s a good chance you can find someone singing “God reigns; let the earth be glad!” with clenched fists and a cold heart. You can affirm justice with your lips and still hoard power with your hands. You can sing praise and neglect faithful practice.
No, right beliefs don’t automatically produce right action. Because theology isn’t a straight line—it’s more akin to a triple loop of learning:
What we profess,
How we live,
And our honest reflection and change when our lives fall out of sync.Which is why bad theology is so dangerous. Because it doesn’t stay abstract. It resists humility. And it rarely self-corrects. It doesn’t just stay on the page of a forgotten book in the library. It finds its way into public policy and practice. It becomes action. Our theology becomes how we treat others—for good or for harm.
The real truth of our theology is always revealed in the fruit of our actions. Bad theology shows up in the laws we write and the punishments we justify. It becomes who we lock up, who we deport, who we ignore. It shapes what we bless and what we curse. Our actions reveal what kind of God we believe reigns over the world.
I’ve come to believe that all theology eventually becomes either doxology or ideology—either a humble, awe-filled, lived acknowledgment of an ever-revealing God, or a psychological defense mechanism to justify our fear-driven hunger for control and safety.
As Walter Brueggemann reminds us: theology always supports either empire (royal consciousness) or neighbor. It either echoes Pharaoh, or it remembers the cry of the poor.
Bad theology imagines God as primarily interested in power, purity, and punishment.
Good theology imagines God as primarily invested in mercy, neighborliness, and mutual well-being.Now, to be clear, I’m not using “bad” and “good” in a tribal or moralistic way. This isn’t about who’s right or wrong in some ultimate sense. It’s about what kind of God we imagine. Because the God we imagine shapes how we understand everything else—power, authority, goodness, belonging, justice, and even what we call “truth.”
Bad theology assumes God’s primary role is to correct what is wrong—punitive, reactive, and controlling.
Good theology assumes God’s heart responds to suffering—restorative, compassionate, and liberating.The former leads to control, coercion, and shame. It trains us to see others—and even ourselves—through suspicion and disgust. And when we read scripture through that lens, we end up reinforcing even more bad theology!
The latter leads to healing, liberation, and justice. It helps us see people—and the world—with compassion.
And I don’t think that’s too much oversimplification. Nor is it new. The prophet Jeremiah asked long ago if we even know God at all if we ignore the poor:
“He defended the cause of the poor and needy, and so all went well.
Is that not what it means to know me?” —Jeremiah 22:16Knowing God—theology—is not about having the right answers or constructing airtight doctrine. It’s about living in an ever-deepening relationship—with both God and neighbor. It’s about drawing near to pain rather than being the cause of it. It’s about honoring the sacred complexity of our shared humanity. It’s about how we treat those whose lives have been shaped by struggle, circumstance, or simply the difficulty of being human.
So let me try to say it plainly: If your theology doesn’t move you with compassion toward the vulnerable, it isn’t rooted in the God revealed throughout the trajectory of Scripture. If it makes you colder, crueler, more self-congratulatory, or more obsessed with control—then it is not good news. It might announce itself as Christian. But it isn’t like Christ.
A major danger—and one we are living in right now—is when bad theology and harmful action become conjoined. Bad theology becomes active fuel for doing harm in the name of God. In reality, it’s just a political ideology wrapped in religious language. Doxology is not welcome there.
That’s exactly what we’re witnessing today: A theologically warped political theater of control, dominance, and purity chasing after the false gods of safety and supremacy. All dressed up in Jesus-language and golden crosses. Funded by fear. Driven by the desire to conquer, not to serve. And it destroys, rather than restores. It kills, rather than gives life. It is not good news of a cross shaped life. It is bad news with a cross logo.
So what do we do?
We return—boldly and humbly—to the foundation of Christian belief and practice:
- God is love. If you do not know love, you do not know God.
- To love God is to love your neighbor.
- To love your neighbor is to defend the poor, welcome the stranger, and honor the dignity of every image-bearer.
- As you do so, you will experience the nearness of God.
That’s not soft theology.
That’s hard, radical, inconvenient theology. Good theology.
It’s theology that requires hesed—steadfast, holy love.
It’s theology that takes up a cross—self-emptying and sacrificial service.And that just might save us all.
-

This Sunday I get to preach in a local church. Preaching is not as common for me these days as it once was, but it still feels like holy ground. Because for all its imperfections, the local church—at its best—is not meant to entertain us or comfort us. It’s meant to confront us. To ask the kinds of questions that pierce through the noise of our lives and name what’s real. To challenge not just what we believe, but how we live. Not just what we say, but what we’ve built—with our lives and as a society. And this week, through the voice of an unlikely prophet named Amos, God asks one of those confronting questions: “What do you see?” (Amos 7)
As the story goes, the prophet Amos—a farmer, not a pastor or politician—receives a vision of God standing beside a wall with a plumb line in hand. It’s a simple tool, dependent on gravity, used to measure whether something is upright and true. And in God’s hand, it becomes a divine standard. Of particular note: the plumb line is not held up beside the “outsiders,” the “wicked,” or the “unclean.” It’s held beside the church. Beside the people and leaders who claim to represent God. And what it reveals is serious: their walls are built tall, but not straight. Their prayers are loud, but their ethics are hollow. Their beliefs are strong, but their compassion is weak.
That question—What do you see?—isn’t just for Amos. It’s for us. And the way we answer reveals everything. Because we don’t see things simply as they are—we see them through who we’ve become. And if we can no longer see neighborly injustice, perhaps it’s because we’ve trained ourselves not to. If we’re unmoved by the crushing of the vulnerable or the demonizing of immigrants, maybe it’s because we’ve accepted it as normal—or worse, necessary.
What do I see? I see churched people and political leaders claiming to stand for truth and justice, while standing on the crooked side of history. I see too many publicly silent people, who in private acknowledge things are askew. I see asylum-seekers fleeing political violence and economic collapse labeled as threats rather than neighbors. I see legislation crafted to protect the portfolios of billionaires while cutting food programs for children. I see communities of color over-policed and under-resourced. I see pastors thunder about their view of sexual morality, but whisper—if say anything at all—about the sexual abuse happening in their own ministry. And if I can see all this and feel nothing—if I scroll past it, excuse it, or spiritualize it away—then maybe I’ve become what Dietrich Bonhoeffer warned against. Not overtly malicious. But stupid, in the most dangerous and blindly-obedient sense.
Bonhoeffer, writing from within Nazi Germany, called stupidity “a more dangerous enemy of the good than malice.” Why? Because malice can be resisted, reasoned with, even named. But stupidity—the surrender of conscience and thought—has no plumb line for truth. It parrots slogans. It fashions the hat of hate. It reposts, retweets, and rages. It finds belonging in whatever enemy-label is trending. Bonhoeffer watched churches collapse into nationalism and theology co-opted by propaganda. He saw people stop thinking and start echoing the talking points of authoritarian power. He insisted that stupidity isn’t merely a lack of intelligence, but a forfeiting of personal and moral responsibility—the loss of agency. It spreads not in solitude but in crowds, in echo chambers, in mobs, in selective viewership. And yes, it all sounds very familiar.
We need the plumb line. And we need to remember: God’s line is not drawn to destroy—it’s drawn to restore. The question is: will we let ourselves be measured by it? Will we allow our beliefs, institutions, politics, and spirituality to be checked for alignment?
The plumb line is grace—but grace with clarity. To accept it, we must name what we see. We must reveal the truth of who we have become. And that naming may cost us. Sure, the temptation to stay quiet is strong. And the courage to stand against what we once stood with requires trusting the plumb line.
So, what do you see? And if you see it—will you say it? And if you say it—will you stand against it? God is still holding the line. Not just in the world “out there,” but in us.
And if we are to follow the Way of Jesus in any meaningful way, we must walk that line—not toward self-preservation, but toward love of neighbor. For, that is where true alignment begins—and ends.
